Showing posts with label character examinations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label character examinations. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Defending Enjolras


That post title was basically an oxymoron.  Why would anyone need to defend Enjolras?  He's awesome, right?

...Apparently not.  I have heard quite a few people say that they don’t like Enjolras at all.


At first I was just like, "Ha!"  But...several of those people made really good arguments against him, so I decided to write a post defending him.  (That's the only reason.  Seriously.  I would never write a post simply to fangirl about Enjolras.  Got it?  Okay, we can go on. :D)


One of the biggest arguments most people seem to have against Enjolras is that he admires and looks up to Robespierre.  Why didn’t he pick Washington or someone like that?
Three words: Robespierre is French. 

Enjolras loved France - and the French Revolution.  I don’t know why…keep in mind that a) he wasn’t alive when the French Revolution happened, and b) perhaps he thought that the French Revolution had a good beginning and just needed to be improved on.  That’s my theory, anyway.
Also, perhaps Victor Hugo merely meant that Enjolras’ place in the June Rebellion was the same as Robespierre’s in the French Revolution- Enjolras was the instigator, the encourager, the leader. 
Besides all that…can you seriously imagine Enjolras trying to be a dictator like Robespierre?  Really?  As far as I know, he doesn’t particularly hate aristocrats.  He wants everyone to be equal and happy.  It’s  basically an impossible dream, but a noble one.

If Enjolras had really been like Robespierre, he wouldn’t have tried to send all the people he could out of the barricade.  He wouldn’t have tried to trade Jehan’s life for Javert’s.  Robespierre sent his closest friends and allies to the guillotine; Enjolras shielded them all with his body as they ran into the wine shop.  

Enjolras died a heroic death with Grantaire. (In the movie and book, anyway.  In the musical, he just dies on the barricades while waving a flag, which is still pretty awesome.)  He forgave Grantaire at the last.  He might have admired Robespierre, but he was still his own person. 




Another thing people don’t like about him is that they say he’d be infuriating if he lived today.  This is true- a typical conversation with Enjo would probably go something like this:
YOU: Hi.  Want to go out for lunch?
ENJOLRAS: I’m busy.
YOU: Want to go to the movies?
ENJOLRAS: I’m busy.
YOU: Want to go to the zoo?
ENJOLRAS: Enough talk!  I have a revolution to plan!
…Yeah.  He probably wouldn’t be especially pleasant to talk to.  But even Victor Hugo admitted that.
“One would have liked to fight under the one [Enjolras] and to march behind the other [Combeferre].”
-Chapter I, “The Friends of the ABC,” Marius, Les Miserables


Enjolras was never interested in social activities or anything of that sort; he had one purpose and he stuck to it.  He was meant to be the leader, not the friend.  He was vulnerable at times, and he probably needed Combeferre during those times, but during the rest he was the untouchable guy.  The fact that he wouldn’t be a very nice person to spend time with doesn’t mean he’s not a hero.

“Enjolras was a charming young man, who was capable of being terrible. He was angelically handsome. He was a savage Antinous. One would have said, to see the pensive thoughtfulness of his glance, that he had already, in some previous state of existence, traversed the revolutionary apocalypse. He possessed the tradition of it as though he had been a witness. He was acquainted with all the minute details of the great affair. A pontifical and warlike nature, a singular thing in a youth. He was an officiating priest and a man of war; from the immediate point of view, a soldier of the democracy; above the contemporary movement, the priest of the ideal. His eyes were deep, his lids a little red, his lower lip was thick and easily became disdainful, his brow was lofty. A great deal of brow in a face is like a great deal of horizon in a view. Like certain young men at the beginning of this century and the end of the last, who became illustrious at an early age, he was endowed with excessive youth, and was as rosy as a young girl, although subject to hours of pallor. Already a man, he still seemed a child. His two and twenty years appeared to be but seventeen; he was serious, it did not seem as though he were aware there was on earth a thing called woman. He had but one passion--the right; but one thought--to overthrow the obstacle. On Mount Aventine, he would have been Gracchus; in the Convention, he would have been Saint-Just. He hardly saw the roses, he ignored spring, he did not hear the carolling of the birds; the bare throat of Evadne would have moved him no more than it would have moved Aristogeiton; he, like Harmodius, thought flowers good for nothing except to conceal the sword. He was severe in his enjoyments. He chastely dropped his eyes before everything which was not the Republic. He was the marble lover of liberty. His speech was harshly inspired, and had the thrill of a hymn. He was subject to unexpected outbursts of soul. Woe to the love-affair which should have risked itself beside him! If any grisette of the Place Cambrai or the Rue Saint-Jean-de-Beauvais, seeing that face of a youth escaped from college, that page's mien, those long, golden lashes, those blue eyes, that hair billowing in the wind, those rosy cheeks, those fresh lips, those exquisite teeth, had conceived an appetite for that complete aurora, and had tried her beauty on Enjolras, an astounding and terrible glance would have promptly shown her the abyss, and would have taught her not to confound the mighty cherub of Ezekiel with the gallant Cherubino of Beaumarchais.”
-Chapter I, “The Friends of the ABC,” Marius, Les Miserables


Enjolras is a really fierce guy.  When I first read the brick and listened to the musical, I didn’t think that he was very true to life.  He seemed to be way too perfect.  But then I reread the book and listened to the musical again, and I found Enjolras to be very realistic.  He is flawed- his devotion to his cause can cause him to be callous or even ruthless to other people, and he’s not very sympathetic about other people’s problems.  If people have a life beyond the revolution, well, too bad for them, in his opinion.

But…I feel compassion for him too.  His family didn’t care much for him and he never had any use for love.  He’s given up as much as Sir Percy has- and more.  Percy has his wife’s love and the support of his friends- and he has God.  Enjolras has no one.  He’s probably never been told of God’s love, and nobody else has ever loved him.  And yet…instead of being angry and bitter, he focuses all the love inside of him on his homeland.  He focuses on France.
Sir Percy gives up his comfortable home, his reputation and his safety.  Enjolras does exactly the same.  The only difference is that Enjolras has no one to help him through hard times but Combeferre.  


Enjolras gave up everything that he had for his cause, but he stayed brave and strong up until the last, ready with a smile and a handshake for anyone who supported him, awing even the soldiers who despised him.

“At length, by dint of mounting on each other's backs, aiding themselves with the skeleton of the staircase, climbing up the walls, clinging to the ceiling, slashing away at the very brink of the trap-door, the last one who offered resistance, a score of assailants, soldiers, National Guardsmen, municipal guardsmen, in utter confusion, the majority disfigured by wounds in the face during that redoubtable ascent, blinded by blood, furious, rendered savage, made an irruption into the apartment on the first floor. There they found only one man still on his feet, Enjolras. Without cartridges, without sword, he had nothing in his hand now but the barrel of his gun whose stock he had broken over the head of those who were entering. He had placed the billiard table between his assailants and himself; he had retreated into the corner of the room, and there, with haughty eye, and head borne high, with this stump of a weapon in his hand, he was still so alarming as to speedily create an empty space around him. A cry arose:
"He is the leader! It was he who slew the artillery-man. It is well that he has placed himself there. Let him remain there. Let us shoot him down on the spot."
"Shoot me," said Enjolras.
And flinging away his bit of gun-barrel, and folding his arms, he offered his breast.
The audacity of a fine death always affects men. As soon as Enjolras folded his arms and accepted his end, the din of strife ceased in the room, and this chaos suddenly stilled into a sort of sepulchral solemnity. The menacing majesty of Enjolras disarmed and motionless, appeared to oppress this tumult, and this young man, haughty, bloody, and charming, who alone had not a wound, who was as indifferent as an invulnerable being, seemed, by the authority of his tranquil glance, to constrain this sinister rabble to kill him respectfully. His beauty, at that moment augmented by his pride, was resplendent, and he was fresh and rosy after the fearful four and twenty hours which had just elapsed, as though he could no more be fatigued than wounded. It was of him, possibly, that a witness spoke afterwards, before the council of war: "There was an insurgent whom I heard called Apollo." A National Guardsman who had taken aim at Enjolras, lowered his gun, saying: "It seems to me that I am about to shoot a flower."
Twelve men formed into a squad in the corner opposite Enjolras, and silently made ready their guns.
Then a sergeant shouted:
"Take aim!"
An officer intervened.
"Wait."
And addressing Enjolras:
"Do you wish to have your eyes bandaged?"
"No."
"Was it you who killed the artillery sergeant?"
"Yes."
Grantaire had waked up a few moments before.
Grantaire, it will be remembered, had been asleep ever since the preceding evening in the upper room of the wine-shop, seated on a chair and leaning on the table.
He realized in its fullest sense the old metaphor of "dead drunk." The hideous potion of absinthe-porter and alcohol had thrown him into a lethargy. His table being small, and not suitable for the barricade, he had been left in possession of it. He was still in the same posture, with his breast bent over the table, his head lying flat on his arms, surrounded by glasses, beer-jugs and bottles. His was the overwhelming slumber of the torpid bear and the satiated leech. Nothing had had any effect upon it, neither the fusillade, nor the cannon-balls, nor the grape-shot which had made its way through the window into the room where he was. Nor the tremendous uproar of the assault. He merely replied to the cannonade, now and then, by a snore. He seemed to be waiting there for a bullet which should spare him the trouble of waking. Many corpses were strewn around him; and, at the first glance, there was nothing to distinguish him from those profound sleepers of death.
Noise does not rouse a drunken man; silence awakens him. The fall of everything around him only augmented Grantaire's prostration; the crumbling of all things was his lullaby. The sort of halt which the tumult underwent in the presence of Enjolras was a shock to this heavy slumber. It had the effect of a carriage going at full speed, which suddenly comes to a dead stop. The persons dozing within it wake up. Grantaire rose to his feet with a start, stretched out his arms, rubbed his eyes, stared, yawned, and understood.
A fit of drunkenness reaching its end resembles a curtain which is torn away. One beholds, at a single glance and as a whole, all that it has concealed. All suddenly presents itself to the memory; and the drunkard who has known nothing of what has been taking place during the last twenty-four hours, has no sooner opened his eyes than he is perfectly informed. Ideas recur to him with abrupt lucidity; the obliteration of intoxication, a sort of steam which has obscured the brain, is dissipated, and makes way for the clear and sharply outlined importunity of realities.
Relegated, as he was, to one corner, and sheltered behind the billiard-table, the soldiers whose eyes were fixed on Enjolras, had not even noticed Grantaire, and the sergeant was preparing to repeat his order: "Take aim!" when all at once, they heard a strong voice shout beside them:
"Long live the Republic! I'm one of them."
Grantaire had risen. The immense gleam of the whole combat which he had missed, and in which he had had no part, appeared in the brilliant glance of the transfigured drunken man.
He repeated: "Long live the Republic!" crossed the room with a firm stride and placed himself in front of the guns beside Enjolras.
"Finish both of us at one blow," said he.
And turning gently to Enjolras, he said to him:
"Do you permit it?"
Enjolras pressed his hand with a smile.
This smile was not ended when the report resounded.
Enjolras, pierced by eight bullets, remained leaning against the wall, as though the balls had nailed him there. Only, his head was bowed.
Grantaire fell at his feet, as though struck by a thunderbolt.
-Chapter XXIII, “The War Between Four Walls,” Jean Valjean, Les Miserables


Enjolras lived bravely and died heroically.  His life was cold and dark, yet he was unafraid.
That is why I consider Enjolras a hero.  He’s not an ideal gentleman like Mr. Knightley.  He’s not a dashing Englishman with a flippant smile on his lips and purpose in his heart like the Scarlet Pimpernel.  He’s a boy who did the best he could.  In the end, isn’t that what counts?

“They were schoolboys, never held a gun,
Fighting for a new world that would rise up like the sun.”
-“Turning,” Les Miserables



If you're sniffling like me (perhaps I'm getting a cold...), then please go and watch this.  The utter awesomeness of it should cheer you up.

{Most of the lovely pictures on here are from the great site lesmiserablescaps.  Thanks!}

Annnnd that's my defense of Enjolras.  Thanks for reading! :)
-Miss Jane Bennet

Saturday, May 25, 2013

I'm Running Out of Interesting Names

Yes, I am.  I'll just have to call the rest of this series "Continuation," or something boring like that.  But.  Anyway.Continuing our Emma character exam, the obvious next person is...
Mr. Knightley! [please insert cheers here.]
So, without further ado, may I present...
(Otherwise known as Mr. Angry Eyes; see Sink Me! for more info.)
Mr. Knightley is knightly.  If you've heard that once, you've heard it 100 times.  No WONDER he gets so angry sometimes.  If I got a pun like that on my name all the time, I'd be mad too.
But that's kind of off-topic here, so let's get back.
In the beginning of the story, Mr. Knightley is "a sensible man of seven or eight-and-thirty," who has been a friend of the Woodhouse family for a long time.  This is owing to several facts:
a) he's next to them in social status,
b) he is the older brother of Isabella Woodhouse's husband, and
c) his expertise in handling Emma's invalid father is second only to Emma's herself.
Mr. Knightley is friendly, blunt and honest- sometimes painfully so- but he can also be commanding or intimidating, and once moves Emma to tears- of shame.
When Emma makes friends with Harriet Smith, Mr. Knightley sees Harriet's worship of Emma as a bad thing, but doesn't mention it to Emma, taking the advice of Emma's old governess, who had recently married and moved out of the family.  He takes it gracefully- even gratefully- showing that he's humble as well.  When he's wrong, he admits it, and when he's proved right- which happens more often- he doesn't gloat.  He can be sarcastic and dry while still behaving in a perfectly gentleman-like manner.
If you don't know who my favorite Austen hero is now...well, I think it's obvious.  He's second only in heroism to Sir Percy Blakeney, who is the awesomest (yes, I KNOW it's not a word.  It's the only word that can describe Sir Percy, though.) hero in the history of literature and media in general.
ANYWAY.
Mr. Knightley is gentle and courteous, and hates seeing less fortunate people being belittled because they're annoying or talk too much.  Yes, I'm talking to you, Miss Bates, so listen up.  However, if he's trying to say something to Miss Bates, and she talks over him, he just talks louder until she's forced to answer his questions AFTER they've been asked.  :)
Even though he loves Emma, Mr. Knightley doesn't let that cloud his judgement of her actions.  During the Box Hill party, he scolds Emma severely because she was rude.  However, even though he's jealous of Frank Churchill- the guy's young, handsome, and seems to have Emma's affection- he doesn't try to be spiteful or separate the two.  He's somewhat miserable, but he won't let that spoil Emma's happiness.
I'm sorry that this post has been a little mixed-up, and maybe I'll do more on Mr. Knightley tomorrow.  However, I'm in somewhat of a hurry right now, so I'll have to end this post.  Again, I apologize and hope people keep reading this blog!
Notes: It's hard to believe, but I'm actually going to be busier now that school's out, so I might not have time to post every day like I have been.  I'll try my hardest, though!  I'll either continue on Mr. Knightley tomorrow or pick a different topic.  Maybe I'll post an "Which Austen Heroine Are You?" quiz.  I've been wanting to do that for a while! :)
PLEASE leave comments.  I'd love to know what your opinions are!
-Miss Jane Bennet



Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Why Defend A Bore?

First- before I explain the interesting title- I just want to say that I have my background all set up.  I hope you like it!
It took forever...
So you had better like it!
ANYWAY.  (Have you noticed I say that a lot?)
Why defend Edmund Bertram a bore?
Because even though I think he's boring, he still deserves a (hopefully) able defense.  So I am going to do a brief post on why Edmund Bertram deserves to be classified with the likes of Henry Tilney, George (ugh! I hate that name!) Knightley, and Mr. (Fitzwilliam is a ridiculous name) Darcy.
A note: This post is NOT meant to defend the movie Edmunds.  THEY cannot be defended.  In my opinion anyway.  Johnny Lee Miller is Mr. Knightley and nobody else, and the other guy does not look like Edmund should look.
ANYWAY.  (See last time I said this.)
In the beginning of Mansfield Park, Edmund has his first scene with Fanny when she's 10 years old and crying on the steps because she misses her home.  Instead of teasing or ignoring her, he stops, asks what's wrong, and then tries to comfort her. 'Nuff said, really.
After a few chapters, the book speeds up until Fanny is 18 and the Crawfords come to visit.  At first, Edmund disapproves of Mary Crawford because she speaks disrespectfully about her uncle and she's...well, pretty much just sassy a lot.  However, he soon falls in love with her.  He still doesn't approve of her behavior, but he blames it on her upbringing and I think that he also hopes that if he marries her, she'll learn better manners.  Then later, when he falls more deeply in love with her, well..."love is blind," after all, and he just stops noticing it.
Some people say that the ending is too abrupt, but I think that it works out perfectly.  Jane Austen slips in little hints all along.  Namely: he corresponds with Fanny, gives her a necklace, and makes her his principal confidante.  It's an easy step to fall in love from there.
Edmund is kind, loving and willing to sacrifice his dignity to keep the family name respectable.  He doesn't approve of the play the Bertrams plan, and he originally tries to dissuade them from it.  However, when they need another actor and are thinking of going to get one from among their neighbors, he compromises and takes a part to keep the play private.  When his father gets home, he tells Sir Thomas exactly what happened and doesn't try shift the blame onto anyone else.  The only person he tries to defend is Fanny.
So, while Edmund Bertram may not be as humorous as Tilney, as chivalrous as Knightley or as romantic as Darcy, while he may be boring and dull, he is every bit a classical hero.  Brave, respectable, loving and kind-hearted.  What more do you want from a hero?
Those are my thoughts.  Please let me know yours in the comments below!
-Miss Jane Bennet

The Most Complicated Character in the Universe

Today I am going to do a character study.  I like those.  Anyway, I was reading through several blog posts and I noticed that Marianne Dashwood doesn't get too much attention.  I'm not sure why, and maybe I'm wrong.  But I figured I'd try to do a post on her myself, so here we are.  Here goes:
*Draws deep breath*
Marianne Dashwood is actually not too complicated.  She just seems like it.  To my mind, she is pretty much a normal teenage girl, although maybe she's more bold about her feelings than most. 
The reason she appears unstable, in my opinion anyway, is that she just tries to make her situation more romantic or dramatic.  After Willoughby left, she wandered around for weeks attempting to relive everywhere he'd been, so she could feel sad and put-upon for as long as possible.  That was a mistake that eventually caused her to become seriously ill.  When she's happy, she goes into raptures of joy and she does care for her sister.  She was selfish, but she a) didn't know the real situation with Edward Ferrars and b) Elinor is a really good actress.  I admire Elinor a lot, as I've already stated, but more on that in a future blog post.

Anyway.  Back to Marianne.

She's somewhat self-absorbed, but not really intentionally.  How many of us have ever been crying and we've thought of every sad thing we can think of to make it more dramatic.  To keep our anger or sadness or whatever the emotion is.  To make someone feel sorry for us.  I know I have.
To my mind, Elinor is what everyone wants to be and Marianne is what everyone is.  Most people have a tiny part in them that wants to forget all about propriety and constrain and just say what they think all the time.  They want to have a romantic adventure happen to them, even if in real life those "romantic adventures" are at best unpleasant and at worst, heartrending.
I know that I've always wished that I could have the courage to say what I think.  I'm not sure if Marianne is really courageous when she comes out with all her emotions, if she's just a drama queen, or if she's actually emotionally unstable.  We'll never know what Jane Austen meant her to be, I guess, but I think she's a little bit of each.
You see, she has sense.  However, she's different from Elinor in that she doesn't want to be in control of herself.  She wants to burst out with her emotions and be...herself, I suppose.  So she has the questionable virtue of the courage to be herself, without attempting to better herself at all.
She's also a lot more romantic than Elinor, as I've already stated.  Think dead leaves.  Her mother has been egging her on to be so from an early age, probably, and so I think that Marianne tries to be more dramatic than she would by herself because she wants to be like her mother.
Also, being like that for most of her life would make it habit, so she probably is a little bit emotionally unstable in that whenever she's the tiniest bit upset, angry, sad, happy or anything else, she will instantly exaggerate it as much as possible.  This could result in what would look like mood swings.
At the end of the story, Marianne attempts to better herself and I think she goes a little too far before finding a happy medium.  She marries Colonel Brandon just because she is grateful and admiring of him.  However, she eventually devotes her entire heart to him.  I think she gets her happy ending.

 So most people have a bit of Marianne in us, and some want to be more like her.  Being able to go into raptures at the slightest beauty and really appreciate all that is around us is a characteristic that I wish I had more of.  With Elinor's self-control and Marianne's loving, appreciating heart, I think that Marianne eventually found the happy medium.


As always, please tell me what you think in the comments.  I'd love to hear suggestions.

A note: Those who think my blog is kind of boring because there isn't a background on it, I should have a pretty good one up by the end of the week.  I'm working on it as soon as I post this.
-Miss Jane Bennet